Forum: Ford Pushrod Tech (5.0 & 5.8)
11-12-2007, 04:06 AM
|
|
Replies: 7
Views: 983
TBH the lack of a BAP sensor on a MAF equipped...
TBH the lack of a BAP sensor on a MAF equipped car is not a problem (the BAP is a hangover from pre MAF days). As long as the ecu is correct for this kind of set up then you will be OK.
I actually...
|
|
Forum: EEC Management
11-09-2007, 12:25 PM
|
|
Replies: 17
Views: 10,693
|
|
Forum: EEC Management
11-07-2007, 09:13 AM
|
|
Replies: 17
Views: 10,693
|
|
Forum: EEC Management
11-07-2007, 08:00 AM
|
|
Replies: 17
Views: 10,693
|
|
Forum: EEC Management
07-16-2007, 02:57 PM
|
|
Replies: 5
Views: 3,205
|
|
Forum: Tweecer
05-08-2007, 01:32 PM
|
|
Replies: 13
Views: 5,670
|
|
Forum: 2.3 Tech
03-20-2007, 08:43 AM
|
|
Replies: 21
Views: 5,931
|
|
Forum: 2.3 Tech
02-13-2007, 12:20 PM
|
|
Replies: 21
Views: 5,931
There's some more things that require altering...
There's some more things that require altering for a 4 cylinder conversion;
Engine_Displacement (aka SARCHG) perhaps I'm stating the obvious with this one.
Ignition_Degrees_Per_PIP (aka DEGPIP) -...
|
|
Forum: 2.3 Tech
02-12-2007, 06:08 AM
|
|
Replies: 21
Views: 5,931
|
|
Forum: Tweecer
11-25-2006, 06:09 PM
|
|
Replies: 11
Views: 7,397
|
|
Forum: EEC Management
06-26-2006, 01:43 PM
|
|
Replies: 87
Views: 15,216
Re: Mass Air on 2.3's
I've done a comparison between the stock bin and the good chip and have the following items as changed;
DEFAULT_IDLE_MASS_AIR
L248A (use unknown)
L248C (use unknown)
OPEN_LOOP_SELECT_TABLE...
|
|
Forum: EEC Management
06-26-2006, 08:21 AM
|
|
Replies: 87
Views: 15,216
Re: Mass Air on 2.3's
In a word, yes. But I'm not really familiar with the LA3 so I couldn't say what to adjust at the moment.
Spotted the injector size change, I haven't had chance to look at the stock vs chip changes...
|
|
Forum: EEC Management
06-26-2006, 05:18 AM
|
|
Replies: 87
Views: 15,216
Re: Mass Air on 2.3's
Done a quick comparison between the working and 'dead' chips, they are identical except for changes to the Acceleration_Enrichment_Table and the VAF_Transfer_Table.
|
|
Forum: EEC Management
06-26-2006, 02:53 AM
|
|
Replies: 87
Views: 15,216
|
|
Forum: EEC Management
06-24-2006, 04:33 PM
|
|
Replies: 87
Views: 15,216
|
|
Forum: EEC Management
06-24-2006, 02:25 AM
|
|
Replies: 87
Views: 15,216
Re: Mass Air on 2.3's
Dale, would you care to share the chip read? I wouldn't mind having a peek to see what's changed. I'm not too familiar with the LA3 but do know a little about it because I've used the code to help...
|
|
Forum: EEC Management
06-04-2006, 03:18 AM
|
|
Replies: 87
Views: 15,216
Re: Mass Air on 2.3's
It would be interesting to see the code changes, the VAF to MAF side is straight forward enough but it's all the little changes like range errors I'm curious about.
|
|
Forum: Tweecer
03-31-2006, 04:45 AM
|
|
Replies: 18
Views: 4,500
Re: Lambse.. Explain
You're right about needing to change the lambda sensor for a wideband that could run from 10:1 to say straight air (the 29.82:1 is a software limitation).
The software side of things gets more...
|
|
Forum: Tweecer
03-29-2006, 04:43 PM
|
|
Replies: 18
Views: 4,500
Re: Lambse.. Explain
This is not strictly correct, it's possible to set the closed loop AF ratio from anywhere between 29.28:1 and virtually 10:1 if you know where to look in the code.
EDIT: typo fixed, changed 0:1 to...
|
|
Forum: EEC Management
03-08-2006, 10:18 AM
|
|
Replies: 18
Views: 4,840
Re: BOV to atmosphere
The only way I can of doing it is;
air filter - turbo - intercooler - bov - maf - throttle - manifold
Intercooler and bov could be the other way around, so could the maf and throttle.
|
|
Forum: EEC Management
03-08-2006, 05:10 AM
|
|
Replies: 18
Views: 4,840
Re: BOV to atmosphere
Probably not, there's no way to know how much metered air is being lost and the eec has no idea of what's going into the engine. Why not use a recirculating dump valve?
|
|
Forum: Tweecer
01-31-2006, 12:50 PM
|
|
Replies: 56
Views: 17,434
Re: New Binary Editor
Currently the 'Item Finder' tool and 'Difference' tool in TunerPro will not work for functions, Mark is aware of this and hopefully will release a fix soon.
|
|
Forum: Tweecer
01-28-2006, 04:29 PM
|
|
Replies: 56
Views: 17,434
|
|
Forum: Tweecer
01-28-2006, 12:43 PM
|
|
Replies: 56
Views: 17,434
Re: New Binary Editor
Hmm, don't know why Clint has got Idle Spark Multiplier at 0x7448, he's also got Spark Retard For Knock Sensor there too. Please bear in mind it's easy to make a mistake in these xdf's, there's a...
|
|
Forum: Tweecer
01-28-2006, 09:00 AM
|
|
Replies: 56
Views: 17,434
Re: New Binary Editor
Tried the FordEmu out today with the Ostrich, didn't get chance to play for long but all I can say is that it worked excellently and I cannot wait to get back to it. My ecu doesn’t work with...
|
|
Forum: Tweecer
01-28-2006, 03:26 AM
|
|
Replies: 56
Views: 17,434
Re: New Binary Editor
I pretty much 100% sure than the address 0x9448 is correct because the code does this: if rpm >= (Average speed * RPM to MPH Ratio for First Gear) than (rpm / 2) then skip Torque Reduction Table...
|
|
Forum: Tweecer
01-27-2006, 01:27 PM
|
|
Replies: 56
Views: 17,434
|
|
Forum: EEC Management
09-06-2005, 10:31 AM
|
|
Replies: 4
Views: 7,820
Re: EECV timing explained
Thanks Dale, could you enlighten me further, I must admit I don't know much about how the eec handles forced induction. My post is aimed at normally aspirated tuning and to try to clarify the...
|
|
Forum: EEC Management
09-03-2005, 06:03 AM
|
|
Replies: 4
Views: 7,820
Re: EECV timing explained
My observations on the BASE and ALTITUDE spark tables are that from the eec-iv codes I've seen on MAF equipped cars the two tables appear to be a hang over from the pre MAF and very early MAF...
|
