StreetStangs.net - View Single Post

Scothew · 05-24-2007, 09:02 AM

Why is a file with a .jpeg extension can be 193k for attachment and one with .jpg extension is only 143k.

I know I use .jpg more thans than not and never really use .jpeg, I would have thought the sizes would have been reveresed or the same.

Just an observation I just ran across.

05-24-2007, 09:02 AM	#1
Scothew Censored Jihad Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: B'ham, AL Posts: 4,108	Picture size question.. Why is a file with a .jpeg extension can be 193k for attachment and one with .jpg extension is only 143k. I know I use .jpg more thans than not and never really use .jpeg, I would have thought the sizes would have been reveresed or the same. Just an observation I just ran across. __________________ Theres only one way to get to Carnegie Hall..... .... Practice.