StreetStangs.net  

Go Back   StreetStangs.net > Technical > Mod Motor Tech (4.6 & 5.4)
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-08-2007, 06:26 PM   #21
adrenaline=lifeline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 29
Yea it is $$$$$
adrenaline=lifeline is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2007, 09:39 PM   #22
Sendero
Im gonna show her my...
 
Sendero's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Somewhere providing FREE tech support.
Posts: 4,269
What do you want out of this car? You would gain a lot more bang-for-the-buck by supercharging a 2V than doing a NA 4V. If you're still serious about a 4V swap, I've got a ton of information about blocks, heads, cams, and etc.
__________________
I heard it on the internet, so it must be true.

"I believe that a person's moral compass can be determined by how he references free men the right to defend themselves." T. Nugent
"An armed society is a polite society. Manners are good when one may have to back up his acts with his life." R. Heinlein
"Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down to their level, then beat you with experience." -Unknown
Sendero is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2007, 10:01 PM   #23
adrenaline=lifeline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 29
My final set up would be twin turbos. i would greatly appreciate the info.
adrenaline=lifeline is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2007, 10:19 PM   #24
TheJeanyus
Administrator
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Huntsville, AL
Posts: 14,774
You could make retarded power with a TT 2V. More than enough to be completely useless on the street.
__________________
1998 Mustang GT Coupe - World's Slowest Racecar
2005 Toyota 4Runner SR5 V8
2013 Volkswagen Jetta Sportwagen TDI
TheJeanyus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2007, 10:30 PM   #25
adrenaline=lifeline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 29
yea but the 4v engines seem to have needed less work

Last edited by adrenaline=lifeline; 11-08-2007 at 10:37 PM.
adrenaline=lifeline is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-09-2007, 04:00 AM   #26
QWKSNKE
3v's are slow
 
QWKSNKE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Here and There
Posts: 17,152
4v would not need less work to make equivalent power. Both would need forged bottom ends. Asilver2001gt's car has stock 2v heads and a kenne bell. Makes 600 to the tires on a conservative tune
__________________
2009 Porsche Carrera S
2008 ///AMG C63.. Eurocharge Tune. RIP
2019 AMG GLC43..wife's
03 F250 SD.. Edge Evo, AFE Stage 1 CAI
08 GT. JBA axle back, FRPP springs, FRPP swaybars.. daughter's
01 Cobra vert... wife's

I need a new toy
QWKSNKE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-09-2007, 04:29 AM   #27
TheJeanyus
Administrator
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Huntsville, AL
Posts: 14,774
Quote:
Originally Posted by QWKSNKE View Post
4v would not need less work to make equivalent power. Both would need forged bottom ends. Asilver2001gt's car has stock 2v heads and a kenne bell. Makes 600 to the tires on a conservative tune


Both will need a forged bottom end. If you want to do work to the heads and custom cams, the 4V will just end up costing a lot more money.
__________________
1998 Mustang GT Coupe - World's Slowest Racecar
2005 Toyota 4Runner SR5 V8
2013 Volkswagen Jetta Sportwagen TDI
TheJeanyus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-09-2007, 09:45 AM   #28
adrenaline=lifeline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 29
so with the forged bottom end and the 2v heads wat would be max amount of hp i could push it to compared to the 4v 1000hp w tt?
adrenaline=lifeline is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-09-2007, 01:27 PM   #29
mrmustangconvert
Senior Member
 
mrmustangconvert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: at your moms
Posts: 407
[quote=adrenaline=lifeline;134956]so with the forged bottom end and the 2v heads wat would be max amount of hp i could push it to compared to the 4v 1000hp w tt?[/quote


well it will take more to make a 4.6 2v to get around 1000 hp. but it is definatly possible. but i read an artical where they got a 5.4 navigator and forged the bottom end and ported the heads, along with changing the compression and cams (stage two). anyways they put a single 67 mm turbo on it and it made an easy 1002 to the flywheel with 17 ponds of boost.

but on the other hand i read where they got a 98 4.6 block and the non pi 2v heads and it made around 713 hp with twin 57mm turbos. but they ported the heads and put cams in it. thats not to bad for a 2v

but its all going to be expensive no matter where you go. modular motors are very expensive compared to the traditional pushrod motors.

but if you want to make some good power cheap id say kenne bell it and forge the bottom end, you will definatly make an easy 500 hp. but thats my opinion
__________________
13.068 @ 102 with a 1.732 60 ft, 4:30 gears and drag radials, 2.5 inch exaust, x pipe w/ flowmasters, stock motor and trans
mrmustangconvert is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-09-2007, 04:29 PM   #30
Matt2105
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Jacksonville, AL
Posts: 584
MPH had a 2valve that had a KB 2.6 I believe and they put down ~830rwhp...and supposedly that was with only 7 cylinders.
Matt2105 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:51 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.