StreetStangs.net  

Go Back   StreetStangs.net > Technical > Project Cars
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-24-2010, 09:53 PM   #31
BLOWN95GT
Senior Member
 
BLOWN95GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Oneonta, Alabama
Posts: 401
Quote:
Originally Posted by grabbinandstabbin View Post
on the balancer i would say go 0 balance. but that is my opinion. for the balance on the crank, rods and pistons there is a guy in anniston named ed chandler that has done a couple balance jobs for me in the past and did me a dang good job at a fair price. i have always been told not to buy a balanced kit. i was told it is a waste of money and that it would need to be rebalanced anyway. i also found that it was cheaper to buy the unbalanced kit and pay him to balance it that it was to buy the balanced kit. lmk if you need his number. he only charged me 125 to balance everything but that was several years ago.
Probe has a deal going on right now if you buy a stroker kit from them you get the balance for free, but I am going to have the new machine shop do a blueprint and balance job to make sure everything will hold together with no vibration, what is a good harmonic balancer to get? he is going to balance the kit with the harmonic balancer, flywheel, and clutch assymbly.
BLOWN95GT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2010, 09:23 AM   #32
coupe
Super Moderator
 
coupe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 6,313
If you have money to burn, get an ATI, Innovators West, Fluidamper, etc..

On a budget, I like the Romac Balancers. I got my Romac from AD Performance but I think you can get it through CHP/Probe as well.
coupe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2010, 11:56 AM   #33
BLOWN95GT
Senior Member
 
BLOWN95GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Oneonta, Alabama
Posts: 401
Quote:
Originally Posted by coupe View Post
If you have money to burn, get an ATI, Innovators West, Fluidamper, etc..

On a budget, I like the Romac Balancers. I got my Romac from AD Performance but I think you can get it through CHP/Probe as well.
Yea I was looking at the ATI, and the Romac just havn't made up my mind. is 9 to 1 a good compression ratio for a turbo car?
BLOWN95GT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2010, 01:06 PM   #34
SlowJoe
Mind Blowing
 
SlowJoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Dawsonville Ga
Posts: 3,913
U have to thank is it 9 to1 with piston at 0 deck? How deep is ur piston going to be at tdc? 9 to 1 will work good but u will need to stay on top of the tune. As i have been told. What cc dish are they?
__________________
Slow Joe Racing
2008 dodge ram 5.7 HEMI
1993 lx with a 289 and a 3 speed on the floor
WTB 1955 t-bird project
SlowJoe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2010, 09:13 AM   #35
nxcoupe
Senior Member
 
nxcoupe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Somewhere, Afghanistan
Posts: 122
yeah, have to measure how far down in the hole they are at tdc and then you can always run a thicker cometic head gasket to drop it down a bit more. Intercooled turbos are easier on parts, but they are still hotter than an intercooled centri blower.
__________________
Michael
92 coupe R/S 8
nxcoupe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2010, 09:39 AM   #36
SlowJoe
Mind Blowing
 
SlowJoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Dawsonville Ga
Posts: 3,913
I would keep a .045 quanch pad.
__________________
Slow Joe Racing
2008 dodge ram 5.7 HEMI
1993 lx with a 289 and a 3 speed on the floor
WTB 1955 t-bird project
SlowJoe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2010, 10:29 PM   #37
coupe
Super Moderator
 
coupe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 6,313
9:1 is about perfect. I am around 8.5:1 and wish I had gone a little more due to the smallish cubes.

With today's better cylinder heads and turbo-cams, I would not hesitate to run 10:1 and shoot a little methanol if I had to run a little more boost to make the power.
coupe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2010, 10:34 PM   #38
nxcoupe
Senior Member
 
nxcoupe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Somewhere, Afghanistan
Posts: 122
Quote:
Originally Posted by coupe View Post
9:1 is about perfect. I am around 8.5:1 and wish I had gone a little more due to the smallish cubes.

With today's better cylinder heads and turbo-cams, I would not hesitate to run 10:1 and shoot a little methanol if I had to run a little more boost to make the power.
Really? I would think you'd have to pull so much timing out that it would leave a lot on the table? What about using E85 with that compression ratio?
__________________
Michael
92 coupe R/S 8
nxcoupe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2010, 01:28 AM   #39
BLOWN95GT
Senior Member
 
BLOWN95GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Oneonta, Alabama
Posts: 401
Quote:
Originally Posted by nxcoupe View Post
Really? I would think you'd have to pull so much timing out that it would leave a lot on the table? What about using E85 with that compression ratio?
The lowest compression pistons probe industries has are 9 to 1 and they will have to cut a valve relief in them for the trick flow heads. I really want to be able to run pump gas mixed with a little race gas. Looking to make at least 650rwhp.
BLOWN95GT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2010, 03:45 AM   #40
nxcoupe
Senior Member
 
nxcoupe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Somewhere, Afghanistan
Posts: 122
Well I am a probe dealer and all their pistons come either TFS or inline valve config, or they come with both if they are an older set. Why do they have to cut valve reliefs? Did they get the wrong kit or just out of the pistons? If I can help out in any way let me know. If you had a larger combustion chamer you could knock it down some, but as matt said, don't think it's an issue anyway.
__________________
Michael
92 coupe R/S 8
nxcoupe is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:18 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.